Welcome to the LnLP Forums and Resource Area

We have updated our forums to the latest version. If you had an account you should be able to log in and use it as before. If not please create an account and we look forward to having you as a member.

Bit of a play question here - on Bn HQ being a little closer

GoodGuy

Member
Joined
May 20, 2015
Messages
443
Points
28
Location
Cologne
.... those forces with more motorized equipment having an advantage over those which rely more on foot and horse-borne command control support.

This goes for the actual food and ammunition supply for the command + control elements of non-motorized or partly motorized units, but not for the actual act of issuing orders or spreading infos.
The HQ of a non-motorized inf regiment had a similar amount of Krad messengers, if compared to a (partly) motorized inf rgt HQ and even to an HQ of a Panzer regiment, in addition to the usual number of radios.
Its (horse-drawn) signal platoon established regular radio and telephone services to keep in touch with its Bns and the parent division.

In 1943, a Pz Rgt just had 3 Krad messengers, while the 3 Kübelwagen and 2 "medium" passenger cars were meant to chauffeur the officers, but some of these cars/drivers could be assigned for messenger missions, if necessary/possible.

The 1941 Panzer Rgt layout listed 5 Krad messengers but only 2 medium passenger cars.

The new 1943 layout of a non-motorized Inf Rgt listed 3 messengers on 3 horses, 3 additional messengers (2 on bikes) and 3 Krad messengers. The 3 chauffeurs of the HQ had 3 Kübelwagen at their disposal, but they could be employed as messengers, too.
While the officers (rgt. CO, adjutant, aide-de-camp and veterinary surgeon) were supposed to use their horses, they probably often used 1 of the cars in urgent cases, instead.
 
Top