I tend to like the longer duration higher level operational scenarios involving coordinated efforts among multiple divisions and / or multiple corps to achieve the scenario objectives.
Those scenarios tend to require a significant amount of attention to detail in discovering the enemy strengths and weaknesses, aligning supply and maneuver capabilities to contain the strengths and exploit the weaknesses, tending to engaged unit combat readiness during the course of the battle, and incremental measurements of plan results during the term of the battle.
They allow for focus on local combat details down to brigade and battalion levels in the more critical battlefield areas, and delegating broader goals to larger unit leaders in the areas that are less critical to the overall plan at those moments. It fits into a 27-year civilian career I spent with the US Army dealing with future combat logistics planning from the tactical thru strategic levels for new designs of Army combat vehicle platforms / systems.
Particular favorites include Widening the Corridor (just because I've read a significant amount about Patton's combat philosophy), Encircling Aachen (a broad battlefield scope with relatively limited free combat resources compared to the enemy's strength) and All American over Nijmigen (tactical goals over a wide geographic area with relatively limited resources).
As my Dad spent four years in Europe during World War II, I tend to take the American side in battles, and favor the offensive operations over the defensive operations.
Take care,
jim