Welcome to the LnLP Forums and Resource Area

We have updated our forums to the latest version. If you had an account you should be able to log in and use it as before. If not please create an account and we look forward to having you as a member.

Clash of Steel

Jay Townsend

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
149
Points
28
Clash of Steel

I haven’t played this series since the second edition rules and the third edition scenario book came out, I finally had time and rereading the rules last night, I played out two scenarios, with the first one being Clash of Steel. Most of the scenarios from Stalin’s Triumph are large than the other games in the series, so you get more formations and units to manage.

One thing I didn’t remember was both the Acquisition and Overwatch rules. They seem neat on paper but I don’t think they are necessary and they just give you more to manage. But I can see the Acquisition rule helping out in getting rid of the stubborn defenders, so it helps balance things out, so I’ll let that one slide but the Overwatch, I feel is pretty much taken care of with Opportunity Fire and Fire & Move or Move & Fire rules. So I not a fan of the Overwatch or managing it with a ton of other things going on in the battlefield.

The Scenario Clash of Steel is great mix of unit types and you really get the Kursk feel to the battle. A couple things I noticed, the German Pioneer units don’t have the NATO engineer symbol on them and the units fonts are much smaller to read when setting up the scenarios but fortunately they all have different color strips or bands, so once you find one, the rest are easier to pick out. With scenarios of this size I could have used a few more Barrage counters, Disrupted and Wreck counters. I kept track of how many barrages and fate points I had by putting these counters on the turn track.

The game play was pretty exciting with the chip/formation marker pull and the action on the battlefield. In my scenario the Soviets won, as the Germans could not take all the city hexes of Pokrovka in 9 turns. In fact I called the game after 8 turns, as the situation on the battlefield wasn’t going to change enough in one turn. I made the mistake of using most of my German armor, to block the Soviet armor coming in on the north edge of the map as reinforcements on turn 2. It would have been much better to use all my forces to conquer the city hexes and deal with the Soviet armor further south as they approached the city. Instead they got tangled up in a tank battle in the north and the Infantry in the south could have used more support instead of a last ditch effort. Or at least use a smaller amount to block north. But I really didn’t know until about 5 turns in and that is half the fun of playing these scenarios. I few dice rolls here and there, a different strategy or two and the results would have been different. I will recommend that the Soviet’s light tanks, the T-70s take on lighter German armor and armored cars, like the Pz-IIIs and the SdKfz 222s and avoid the heavier armor if possible. It’s kind of like the American Stuart tank, the same situation. Overall, a great gaming experience with many unique events that happened throughout, in a Soviet Victory!
 

Sean Druelinger

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
104
Points
18
Age
59
Over watch can be optional if you like but it gives an attacker (or defender) the ability to move, not be ops complete and still op fire at any thing that comes into LOS. But especially for infantry running up on an ops complete tank that moved and get to assault that platoon unscathed.

thank you
Sean Druelinger
 

Geoff Curran

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
7
Points
1
Age
64
Location
Winchester Uk
I would not change either acquisition or Overwatch. They are both relevant. I feel that the current rules are pretty honed.
 
Top