Gerbini/Sferro Station (Sicily, July 1943)

Discussion in 'CO2 - Scenarios' started by Kaunitz, Apr 25, 2019.

  1. Kaunitz

    Kaunitz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hello community

    I’m currently working on a map + scenario covering the battle of Gerbini/Sferro Station in July 1943. Originally, I wanted to create a scenario for Combat Mission, but I’ve put it on hold for various reasons. Generally speaking, Command Ops lends itself much better to historical scenarios, without making too many adjustments for “fun” gameplay. Anyway, you can take a look in my research in the CM forum here: LINK.

    Here is a screenshot of the current state of the map. It is still a work in progress and I plan to increase its size slightly. As you can see, I had to make some compromises with the height layers. I use height intervals of 20m for my altitude layers. Some of the higher mountains/regions in the north have to be cut off / flattened in return for a higher fidelity of the flatter terrain in the south.

    [​IMG]

    As you would expect, the OOB for the Allies is easy to find. The OOB of the Axis not so much. But after some research, I’m confident that I got it as accurate as it can get. If you have any tips for me (in excess of the sources I’ve used – see the post below) I would be glad if you could share them with me! :)

    As my research for the axis OOB for this particular scenario forced me to consider the bigger picture and the axis OOB for the whole of Sicily, I also have the intention to create further Sicily scenarios for COII, starting with Primosole Bridge + Catania and perhaps the battles of Sferro Hills and the Canadian push on the left flank, all of which are very close to the Gerbini battle both topographically and time-wise. In the long run, I’d also be looking at the US battles further to the northwest (e.g. Troina) and the landings (Gela counterattacks).

    While I’m happy with the OOBs, the exact deployment/position of the forces – especially the Axis forces - at the start of the scenario has to be based on conjecture.

    I’m planning to update this post with more information on the scenario in the future, so stay tuned.
     
    #1 Kaunitz, Apr 25, 2019
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2019
    Seb3brv78, ioncore and panzerpit like this.
  2. Kaunitz

    Kaunitz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    10
    Sources (online)

    For a contemporary 1943 map (1:25.000) take a look here: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/italy_25k/ (Gerbini) (same here: http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/maps/europe/zoomify138659.html ). This seems to be the US Army Map Service -map that the allied troops actually used during the campaign.

    You can compare this to modern maps, like the OpenTopo map (https://opentopomap.org/#map=15/37.47215/14.84386) and google maps (https://www.google.at/maps/@37.4691357,14.842885,1698m/data=!3m1!1e3).

    Thanks to the 51st Division online museum, some quite detailed reports of the action are available online:
    I also found this account quite helpful: https://weaponsandwarfare.com/2017/02/25/the-plain-of-catania-1943-part-i/

    I could even find some drawings by the Division's artist Ian Gilber Marr Eadie (1917–1973):http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/8379 It is labeled with "Gerbini".

    Two findings in the Canadian War Museum (I suppose it's Monte Turcisi in the background)
    https://www.warmuseum.ca/collections/artifact/2691135/?q=service:Canadian+Army&page_num=1&item_num=13&media_irn=5559681
    https://www.warmuseum.ca/collections/artifact/2690855/?q=service:Canadian+Army&page_num=2&item_num=2&media_irn=5559787


    Sources (books)

    more general titles
    • Samuel W. Mitcham Jr./ Friedrich von Stauffenberg: The Battle of Sicily. How the Allies Lost Their Chance for Total Victory (Stackpole Military History Series (1991).
    • Carlo D’Este: Bitter Victory. The Battle for Sicily, July–August 1943 (1988).
    • Albert N. Garland / Howard McGaw Smyth: United States Army in World War II. Mediterranean Theater of Operations: Sicily and the Surrender of Italy (1965). [short description of the German forces...]
    • Hugh Pond, Sicily (1962).
    • Eric Linklater:The Campaign in Italy (Second World War 1939 - 1945 Series) (1977).
    more specific titles
    • Claude Gillono, Fortress. German Armour In The Defence Of Sicily (Firefly Collection No.3) (2013). [very usefull for me, regarding the axis OOB and equipment!]
    • Lorenzo Bovi, Sicilia WW2, Seconda Guerra Mondiale - Foto inedite. Speciale Aeroporti: Catania, Gerbini (2016). [includes an extract of a British air recon map sketching the (primarily AA) defences around Gerbini runway, including the pillboxes you can still see today - very valuable information - without it, you don't understand the initial artillery fire plan of the attack; there was a major trench network at the areas of artillery concentrations E & D]
    • [pending: Claude Gillono - Hermann Göring Panzer Division in Sicily (2008)]
     
    #2 Kaunitz, Apr 25, 2019
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2019
    ioncore likes this.
  3. Bones26

    Bones26 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2017
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    2
    May I suggest as a further future source, Mark Zuehlke and one of his volumes from his Canadian Army campaigns of WWII, more specifically his book entitled, " Operation Husky - The Canadian Invasion of Sicily, July 10 - August 7, 1943"

    His also has several other volumes pertinent to the Italian campaigns and that deal with the Canadian Army efforts at Ortona, the Liri Valley and the Gothic Line.

    As an aside, and for those interested in perhaps exploring the Canadian experience during the Italian campaign a bit further but at perhaps a more granular level, may I suggest the book "The Regiment" by Farley Mowat. In it he recounts the story of the Hasty P's (The Hastings and Prince Edward Regiment, Canada's most decorated regiment of the war winning 31 battle honours) from their recruitment in September 1939 until wars end concentrating largely on their efforts during the Italian campaign, and this from his perspective as a second lieutenant and platoon leader in the Regiment. Additionally, there is his own grim personal memoire of his own second world war service in his excellent book "And No Birds Sang"

    Mowat was one of Canada's most esteemed & recognized writers (he has authored 45 books) and in his moving accounts of these campaigns he foregoes a simple dry recitation of units and maneuvers alone as one might otherwise expect from a military history, to also capture the sights, sounds, confusion, valiantly and human consequences of war.

    Cheers and good luck.
     
    ioncore likes this.
  4. Kaunitz

    Kaunitz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hi Bones25!

    Thank you for the tip! I will certainly take a look once I'm working on a "Canadian" scenario. I do plan to create other Sicily scenarios for COII, including those involving the Canadian Division. In this thread though I'm dealing solely with the engagement at Gerbini & Sferro Station (Highland Division versus parts of the Hermann Göring Panzer Division).
     
  5. jimcarravallah

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2014
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    84
    It's refreshing to see the CO2 engine used to recreate battles on a new front.

    I believe this is the first scenario planned to reflect the Allied offensive against "soft underbelly" of the Axis in Europe in 1943.

    Others have used this site (https://forum.axishistory.com/viewforum.php?f=56&sid=d0608090da6957f6c2c9a9935c3bee83) to document OOBs, TO&Es, and Axis deployments in previous scenarios. It might be worth a check for any Axis force deployments in Sicily.
     
  6. Kaunitz

    Kaunitz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hi, jimcarravallah!

    Thanks for the link, I will take a look!

    I have to admit that the italo-german OOB is giving me lots of headaches for the Gerbini scenario. So much in fact that I consider to do the Primosole Bridge scenario first (map is already 1/2 finished). It's better documented than the Gerbini battle and also, getting a clearer picture of the units present at Primosole/Catania helps me to deduce what units were likely present at Gerbini, as the two front sectors were adjacent.

    But even in the case of Primosole bridge, some major questions remain unanswered. Most authors who have written about it seem to get a bit carried away by the "Red Devils verus Green Devils epicness". I'm pretty deep into it currently and I still don't know when the Fallschirmjäger Regiment 4 actually landed (most books indicate 14th July, but it seems as if the Fallschirmjäger-Pionier-battalion that held the bridge was only relieved by FJ Reg. 4 on July 17th). I'm currently trying to lay my hands on an account of one of the members of the FJ Pioniere to get some certainty. And I'm not certain about the position of Fallschirmjäger Regiment 3 at the dawn of 14th July (=start of the scenario). Somewhere south of the bridge, in between the Simeto and the British, perhaps rather to the east, towards the see...

    But then again I suppose most people playing the scenario don't care that much anyway. The only sign that a scenario's OOB has been well researched is usually that it features mixed ad hoc units with strange names. But when working on a scenario the spirit of research takes over at some point. ;)

    Any way, the Primosole/Catania scenario is interesting and challenging. It Features lots of fortifications, naval support fire, British commandos (trying to secure the Ponte dei Malati) and Paras, italian assault troops (Arditi) in Saharina jeeps, etc. etc.
     
    #6 Kaunitz, Apr 28, 2019
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2019
  7. jimcarravallah

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2014
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    84
    I haven't done a lot of detailed research on the Italian front, though I find the battles in Sicily intriguing as they included the first mass combined seaborne / airborne invasion effort against a defended coast (in effect one of the "proof of principle" tests for D-Day), and evolved into the high maneuver allied advances (Patton's "end run.") in terrain more varied than that in North Africa.

    As far as Axis deployments, keep in mind that the scenario creation engine allows for variables in deployment -- "what if?" options to vary the situation faced by the human player when contesting against the computer player. Those options can be set at random, or defined in terms of "favor <side>" to create a balance. They allow for varying the arrival times and places for reinforcements and quantity of supplies to support the forces.

    As a scenario designer you have the option of determining what is "historical" and what is a decision influencing variable.

    If you've got the appropriate OOBs and TO&Es for those OOBs on the map at start, unless you have specific histories detailing deployments to exact locations and at the specific times your scenario covers, the best option is looking at the objectives you define as critical to defense or offense and deploying your known forces at points that support either the defense or the start of offense at the time you choose for the battle to begin.

    In looking at a scenario, you want the opposing forces to face opposition of as realistic a strength and quality as they were at start, and then allow the player(s) to work through the problems the commander(s) faced start with their own plans and actions. "Being historical" doesn't mean every battle ends the same way, but that every commander taking on a "historical" force faces the same problems the original commander faced.

    The scenario should have the potential of ending up as the battle did historically, but shouldn't be judged based on having the same outcome every time (otherwise, why play it more than once?).

    Hope this helps.
     
  8. Kaunitz

    Kaunitz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    10
    jimcaravallah,

    Indeed my aim is not neccessarily to re-create the historical outcome. The starting conditions, the arrival of reserves and the objectives need to be realistic, everything else is up to the player and the AI. The map and the length of the scenario is also a big factor here. I decided to use a rather large map so that players have more freedom in their decisions. E.g. the main objective in the scenario will be the city of Catania, not the Primosole bridge.

    So for me it's important to keep the bigger picture in mind: Cancelling their counter-attacks on the allied embarkment-zones, the axis Forces in this sector (Gruppe Schmalz) have to conduct a fighting retreat to establish a new, cohesive frontline along the Simeto & Dittaino rivers (the Primosole bridge is the easternmost pivot point of that new frontline). The Allies, by contrast, try to break through to Catania as fast as possible, which was a rather difficult task as their troops were lacking mobilisation. The Primosole brigde is only one piece in the operational puzzle and turned out to be not really decisive. As the British were unable to put enough pressure on the retreating Germans, the Germans were able to simply use another bridge (Fergotto bridge) for their withdrawal northwards. As a starting date for the scenario, I'm considering the dawn of July 14. This is after the British paras have landed and taken possession of Primosole bridge. Including the Para's coup de main as part of the scenario would not be that apt and interesting for COII's scale, and also raise problems concerning the demoralized italian units (who were dissolving quickly in the night from 13 to 14 July), the Para's capturing of enemy equipment, the staggered arrival of additional Paras who had dropped further away from the dropzones, etc. Instead, the scenario sets in with the German ad hoc counterattacks against the bridge.

    I admit I'm mainly concerned with the maps and the OOBs for now. I've not taken a closer look at the options for reserves and for implementing "randomness" yet. One important factor here will be the availability of the naval support (HMS Newfoundland) for the Paras. It's date of Arrival should have a large random factor (only very few radios made it through the catastrophical drop, radios were unreliable, etc).

    I'm also happy to report that I've had a small breakthrough yesterday evening as I was able to access the unpublished manuscript “US Army Foreign Military Studies, T-2”. It contains the translated accounts given by some German generals who were involved in the campaign, including Wilhelm Schmalz, shortly after the war (1950). This source is of great importance to me since the Gruppe Schmalz is the main axis force in the Primosole scenario. Schmalz provides information about the units under his command, even including some sketches (I just have to make out the map that is supposed to be used in combination with the sketch).

    I will open up a second threat soon for the Primosole Scenario soon, to discuss some of the more detailed aspects. For example, the British paras had no radio contact with their relief force - how would you represent that in the game? I'm actually considering to turn the Paras into static units, but this is not ideal either.
     
  9. john connor

    john connor Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    2,353
    Likes Received:
    136
    The map looks beautiful. I hope this progresses.
     
  10. Hugo Martinez Rodrigues

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have, in English, the battle order of the Italian army of July 1943 nº 306 / .2-2 if that eventually helps in the continuation of the scenario, only ask me in the private that I send you by email.
     

Share This Page