Hi all
I posted this on the FB page and had some helpful thoughts from the community, but would like to explore this further with the combined wisdom of this forum .
The scenario has the VC setup in a building with an RPG-2, which as I understand is clearly considered ordnance (to hit table on counter reverse etc). Therefore to fire the weapon the MMC will need to move rendering him spotted and therefore thereafter allowing the hex the counter is in to be spotted. Note the special rules in the scenario prevent the USMC from spotting the VC until they move/fire etc.
The scenario has no special rules allowing the firing of ordnance in the buildings. They, as far as I can see, do not allow access to the rooftops.
Therefore I wonder whether this is an error in the scenario setup, or just bad planning by the VC ?
It is quite possible that I have missed something and would welcome any advice or guidance pointing out the error.
Finally, despite this possible slight blip, I have to applaud the layout and clarity of V5.0 and the support that is given to this wonderful system. I wish all rulesets were so well put together, I'm sure it's not perfect but nothing in life is and this comes pretty damn close to my mind!
cheers
John
I posted this on the FB page and had some helpful thoughts from the community, but would like to explore this further with the combined wisdom of this forum .
The scenario has the VC setup in a building with an RPG-2, which as I understand is clearly considered ordnance (to hit table on counter reverse etc). Therefore to fire the weapon the MMC will need to move rendering him spotted and therefore thereafter allowing the hex the counter is in to be spotted. Note the special rules in the scenario prevent the USMC from spotting the VC until they move/fire etc.
The scenario has no special rules allowing the firing of ordnance in the buildings. They, as far as I can see, do not allow access to the rooftops.
Therefore I wonder whether this is an error in the scenario setup, or just bad planning by the VC ?
It is quite possible that I have missed something and would welcome any advice or guidance pointing out the error.
Finally, despite this possible slight blip, I have to applaud the layout and clarity of V5.0 and the support that is given to this wonderful system. I wish all rulesets were so well put together, I'm sure it's not perfect but nothing in life is and this comes pretty damn close to my mind!
cheers
John