I know this post is a couple months old, but I'm a solo gamer and I'm thinking about getting WaW 85 so this is a question for me too. I have a couple ideas based on what I've seen of it and from the expansions description. The hidden aspect of deployment would have to be "simulated" if you will...

Awe man I'm sorry haha. I didn't mean to that guy. But hey I haven't seen any other post about bypass movement here or elsewhere for LnL (that's why I made the post) so at least I'm the only one that brought it up :). Again I wouldn't want the rules changed officially (not unless it was properly...

I enjoyed your take on the subject. 2 pages of SSR with Forgotten War? That seems excessive even by ASL standards. I really don't disagree with you for the most part. I wouldn't want to just start adding ASL concepts willy nilly into LnLT. LnLT already covers some of those concepts its own way...

I'm playing this scenario now and wondering which is correct too. The result of my die roll actually hinges on it lol. Which is most likely correct? Edit: upon rereading the posts here it seems you guys are deferring to the counters.

I figured that would also be an issue too. Usually I wouldn't be looking to house rule anything in LnL tactical because I think the rules are fine how they are, but I really like this specific idea. I get what you mean though, make a small change and it could domino effect fast to get it to...

For those who don't know what that is, it's where you can move a unit along a hex's hexide, vertex to vertex to bypass certain terrain to save on movement costs. It's a rule in ASL, but I was considering trying it out as a house rule in LnL tactical for fun to see if throws the balance totally...

I don't have the answer, but I think it would be best to check the rule clarifications and corrections file in the resource section of this site. It contains errata for all the Lock 'N Load Tactical modules and counters. Try to find your module/counter in the PDF. If you don't see a counter...

In a HATRS scenario I'm playing a buttoned AEO tank has found itself adjacent to an infantry PU in a building. Now Following the AEO rules it will remain buttoned while in line of sight of a PU. The AEO gets the priority order to fire, but the thing is it has to make a spotting attempt with a +1...

Hey, I've been wondering if I've been doing this right for a while so I thought I'd finally ask. The rules say "The air support enters on the NEXT impulse after either player rolls doubles for ANY game-related function". My question is really, would rolling doubles only be defined as such when...