MacMarkus69
Member
Some time ago I posted a question at BGG - Sean Druelinger kindly confirmed my interpretation to be correct and promised to check the matter in detail and come back...
I think the question got lost, but I would still like to see some type of 'official' comment.
Here is the original post:
One of card #51s 2ndary orders reads: "Shaken AEO closest to in-LOS PU => move towards".
I think this collides with the core rule that prohibits shaken units to move closeer to enemy units.
In most cases, shaken units are ordered to move towards cover which makes sense, but other cards order shaken to AEOs to
- Dynamic move away (ok)
- move away (ok)
- move (?!)
Can I assume that "move" and "move towards" should be interpreted like "Move away" when given to shaken AEOs?
Cheers
Mac
I would greatly appreciate any comment on this question.
Thanks in advance
Mac
PS: Here is a link to the BGG thread...
I think the question got lost, but I would still like to see some type of 'official' comment.
Here is the original post:
One of card #51s 2ndary orders reads: "Shaken AEO closest to in-LOS PU => move towards".
I think this collides with the core rule that prohibits shaken units to move closeer to enemy units.
In most cases, shaken units are ordered to move towards cover which makes sense, but other cards order shaken to AEOs to
- Dynamic move away (ok)
- move away (ok)
- move (?!)
Can I assume that "move" and "move towards" should be interpreted like "Move away" when given to shaken AEOs?
Cheers
Mac
I would greatly appreciate any comment on this question.
Thanks in advance
Mac
PS: Here is a link to the BGG thread...